AEMPS

The Role of Search Frictions and Monopsony Power in Shaping the Effects of Tipped Minimum Wage Policy in the U.S. Restaurant Industry

Author

Shengkai Ma * 1

1 University of Toronto

Corresponding Author

Shengkai Ma

Keywords

Tipped minimum wage, Search frictions, Monopsony power, Tip credit, Restaurant labor market

Abstract

In the U.S. restaurant industry, tipped workers receive a large share of their earnings from customers rather than from their employers, and tip credit provisions allow restaurants to pay cash wages below the standard minimum wage. This paper examines why this compensation structure persists and how raising the tipped minimum wage affects wages, employment, and firm behavior. Based on the literature on modern monopsony power and existing evidence on minimum wage policies, labor market concentration, and tipping, this paper develops a search-friction framework in which job-switching costs give individual restaurants wage-setting power even in markets with many employers. The results indicate that restaurants' wage-setting power enables them to maintain wages below competitive levels, implying that a moderate increase in the tipped minimum wage can improve worker earnings and reduce turnover without generating a proportionate loss in employment. However, restaurants respond through multiple channels, including raising menu prices, adjusting service charges and compensation structures, slowing hiring, reducing working hours, and, for low-margin firms, exiting the market. The effects of tipped minimum wage policies therefore rely on the magnitude of the wage increase, restaurant characteristics, and local labor market conditions.

Citation

Shengkai Ma. The Role of Search Frictions and Monopsony Power in Shaping the Effects of Tipped Minimum Wage Policy in the U.S. Restaurant Industry. AEMPS (2026) Vol. 297. DOI: 10.54254/2754-1169/2026.AB36943.

References

[1]: Azar, O. H. (2020). The economics of tipping.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(2), 215–36.

[2]: Dube, A., Lester, T. W., & Reich, M. (2016). Minimum wage shocks, employment flows, and labor market frictions.Journal of Labor Economics, 34(3), 663–704.

[3]: Langella, M., & Manning, A. (2021). Marshall lecture 2020: The measure of monopsony.Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(6), 2929–57.

[4]: Azar, J., Huet-Vaughn, E., Marinescu, I., Taska, B., & von Wachter, T. (2024). Minimum wage employment effects and labour market concentration.Review of Economic Studies, 91(4), 1843–83.

[5]: Wiltshire, J. C., McPherson, C., Reich, M., & Sosinskiy, D. (2024). Minimum wage effects and monopsony explanations. Working paper, University of Victoria.

[6]: Luca, D. L., & Luca, M. (2019). Survival of the fittest: The impact of the minimum wage on firm exit.NBER Working Paper No. 25806. National Bureau of Economic Research.

[7]: Even, W. E., & Macpherson, D. A. (2014). The effect of the tipped minimum wage on employees in the U.S. restaurant industry.Southern Economic Journal, 80(3), 633–655.

[8]: Gopalan, R., Hamilton, B. H., Kalda, A., & Sovich, D. (2021). State minimum wages, employment, and wage spillovers: Evidence from administrative payroll data.Journal of Labor Economics, 39(3), 673–707.

[9]: Georgiadis, A. (2013). Efficiency wages and the economic effects of the minimum wage: Evidence from a low-wage labour market.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(6), 962–979.

[10]: Jardim, E., Long, M. C., Plotnick, R., van Inwegen, E., Vigdor, J., & Wething, H. (2022). Minimum-wage increases and low-wage employment: Evidence from Seattle.American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14(2), 263–314.

Copyright © 2021 Eliwise Academy. Unless Otherwise Stated